The effectiveness of models of flexible provision of higher education / Peter Ling, Geoff Arger, Helen Smallwood, Ron Toomey, Denise Kirkpatrick, Ian Barnard
Published
Canberra : DepartmentofEducation, Training and YouthAffairs, [2001]
1. Key concepts -- 2. Context -- 3. Methodology -- 4. A survey of flexible provision of higher education in Australia -- 5. Swinburne University of Technology (Lilydale) -- 6. University of South Australia (Bachelor of Nursing Whyalla) -- 7. University of Tasmania (BAVE programme) -- 8. Victoria University of Technology (Nyerna Studies, Echuca) -- 9. Deakin University and Ford Australia -- 10. Griffith University (Logan) -- 11. University of Queensland (Ipswich) -- 12. Charles Sturt University (Dubbo) -- 13. University of Southern Queensland (Distance Education Centre) -- 14. University of Ballarat (Graduate Certificates) -- 15. Summaries of findings from case studies -- 16. Conclusion
Summary
This study grew out of a concern about the effectiveness of flexible provision initiatives in affording study choices to students in non-metropolitan regions ofAustralia. The cases chosen for close investigation are ones which provide for students in non-metropolitan regions
Analysis
Australian
Electronicx resource
Notes
Evaluations and Investigations Programme Higher Education Division - tp
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 209-211)