| Description |
1 online resource (xxxiii, 229 pages) |
| Contents |
1. Introduction -- 2. Unpacking Economic Evidence -- 3. Imperfect Alternatives: Actors and Processes for the Review of Economic Evidence in the US and the UK -- 4. Transforming Discretion -- 5. From ‘Hard Look’ Review to ‘Thin Rationality’ Review: The US Courts’ Response to Economic Evidence -- 6. The Institutional Response: Judicial Scrutiny of Economic Evidence at the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal -- 7. Towards a Complementary Relationship between the Court and the Regulatory Agency in the Realm of Utility Regulation -- 8. Epilogue |
| Summary |
This book brings together strands of scholarship from law, economics, and political science to explore two key themes: the influence of economic evidence on the discretionary assessments of economic regulators, and the limits of judicial review of economic evidence, supplemented with comparative examination of both UK and US systems |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Notes |
Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed September 23, 2022) |
| Subject |
Judicial review -- Great Britain
|
|
Judicial review -- United States
|
|
Evidence (Law) -- Great Britain
|
|
Evidence (Law) -- United States
|
|
Evidence (Law)
|
|
Judicial review
|
|
Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of law.
|
|
Law.
|
|
Great Britain
|
|
United States
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| ISBN |
9780192592385 |
|
0192592386 |
|
9780191886188 |
|
0191886181 |
|
