Description |
1 online resource ([12] pages) |
Series |
Special report ; 390 |
|
Special report (United States Institute of Peace) ; 390.
|
Contents |
Tool descriptors and definitions -- Opportunities for dialogue with extremists -- Necessary condition for dialogue -- Risks and challenges -- Practical recommendations |
Summary |
"Dialogue with violent extremist groups is a controversial practice, even when used to prevent widespread violence or atrocities. Humanitarian dialogue may serve as a crisis-mitigation instrument, offering short-term relief and civilian protection. When the risk of atrocities is remote, political dialogue can be used for structural or upstream prevention aimed at conflict resolution or addressing community grievances. Though dialogue as a peacebuilding tool has potential in any stage of a conflict, it is ideally undertaken before widespread violence occurs. However, the conditions for successful atrocity prevention through dialogue with violent extremist groups are rarely in place"--Publisher's web site |
Notes |
"September 2016." |
Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 10-11) |
Notes |
United States Institute of Peace Copyright 2016 2016 |
|
Description based on online resource; title from PDF caption (USIP website, viewed September 2, 2016) |
Subject |
Atrocities -- Prevention
|
|
Negotiation.
|
|
Peace-building.
|
|
Terrorist organizations.
|
|
Negotiating
|
|
Terrorist organizations.
|
|
Negotiation.
|
|
Peace-building.
|
Form |
Electronic book
|
Author |
Claes, Jonas, author.
|
|
United States Institute of Peace, issuing body.
|
|