""Content""; ""Preface""; ""Executive Summary""; ""Abstract""; ""Background""; ""Conclusion and recommendation""; ""1. Introduction""; ""1.1 Background""; ""1.2 Objectives""; ""PART I: Overview of Economic Instruments 2006�2009""; ""2. Introduction""; ""2.1 Scope""; ""2.2 Economic instruments considered""; ""3. Denmark""; ""3.1 Energy and air pollution""; ""3.2 Water pollution""; ""3.3 Waste""; ""3.4 Transport""; ""3.5 Agriculture and natural resources""; ""4. Finland""; ""4.1 Energy and air pollution""; ""4.2 Water pollution""; ""4.3 Waste""; ""4.4 Transport""
""4.5 Agriculture and natural resources""""5. Iceland""; ""5.1 Energy and air pollution""; ""5.2 Water pollution""; ""5.3 Waste""; ""5.4 Transport""; ""5.5 Agriculture and natural resources""; ""6. Norway""; ""6.1 Energy and air pollution""; ""6.2 Water pollution""; ""6.3 Waste""; ""6.4 Transport""; ""6.5 Agriculture and natural resources""; ""7. Sweden""; ""7.1 Energy and air pollution""; ""7.2 Water pollution""; ""7.3 Waste""; ""7.4 Transport""; ""7.5 Agriculture and natural resources""; ""7.6 Outstanding propositions""; ""8 Summary and cross-country comparison""
""9. How do the economic instruments work?""""9.1 Criteria for assessing environmental policy instruments""; ""9.2 Key characteristics of environmental policy instruments""; ""9.3 Brief assessment of the countries� economic instruments""; ""PART II: Analysis of instrument mixes in Nordic environmental policy""; ""10. Instrument mix analysis""; ""10.1 Introduction""; ""10.2 Theory and practice in the use of instrument mixes""; ""10.3 Overview of instrument mixes""; ""10.4 Case study 1: Stationary energy production and use, and climate change policy""
