| Description |
1 online resource (28 pages) |
| Series |
Carnegie papers |
|
Working papers (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace)
|
| Contents |
Summary -- Introduction -- The conceptual framework -- The Ennahda Party in Tunisia -- The Freedom and Justice Party in Egypt -- The Justice and Development Party in Morocco -- The Islamic Action Front in Jordan -- Islamist economic discourse and the way forward -- Policy conclusions |
| Summary |
Islamist parties have gained newfound political power across the Arab world. Four parties in particular -- Tunisia's Ennahda, Egypt's Freedom and Justice Party, Morocco's Justice and Development Party, and Jordan's Islamic Action Front -- have either made a strong showing at the ballot box or are expected to in upcoming elections. Their successes have dredged up fears about their political and social ambitions, with worries ranging from the enforcement of sharia law to the implications for Western tourists on these countries' beaches. Meanwhile, the parties' economic platforms have largely been overlooked, despite the serious challenges that lie ahead for the economies of the Arab world. Economic realities in Tunisia, Morocco, Egypt, and Jordan alike are quite difficult. These countries face high rates of poverty and unemployment, declining productivity and competitiveness, low levels of integration with the global economy, acute disparities between classes and regions, corruption, high domestic and foreign debt, and more. All of these challenges require radical changes in the existing order and far-sighted planning. The question, then, is whether the newly empowered Islamists can deliver the economic results their publics need. Each of these four parties has offered policies to overcome the key economic challenges facing their countries. The proposals, while ambitious, are far from revolutionary, and their programs vary in their level of detail and sophistication -- Ennahda, for instance, is by far the most thorough, while Jordan's Islamic Action Front is still struggling to develop detailed stances. The parties are generally quite pragmatic, asserting that the basic economic system will remain the same but seeking to dramatically improve the management of economic affairs. A number of key points can be discerned from the economic agendas of these four parties. They do not call for the nationalization of industries or the renationalization of privatized state-owned enterprises and demonstrate respect for private property rights. All of the parties welcome partnerships with the private sector to implement their proposed projects, particularly when it comes to public utilities and infrastructure. They consistently agree on the need to combat corruption, strengthen the foundations of good governance, eliminate financial and economic waste, and enact socially just policies. And all demonstrate a commitment to international economic agreements, with Morocco and Tunisia in particular focusing on relations with Europe |
| Notes |
Title from PDF title page (viewed May 29, 2012) |
|
"May 2012." |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 25-26) |
| Subject |
Ḥarakat al-Nahḍah (Tunisia)
|
|
Ḥizb al-Ḥurrīyah wa-al-ʻAdālah (Egypt)
|
|
Ḥizb al-ʻAdālah wa-al-Tanmiyah (Morocco)
|
|
Ḥizb Jabhat al-ʻAmal al-Islāmī (Jordan)
|
| SUBJECT |
Ḥarakat al-Nahḍah (Tunisia) fast (OCoLC)fst00671781 |
|
Ḥizb al-ʻAdālah wa-al-Tanmiyah (Morocco) fast (OCoLC)fst01627627 |
|
Ḥizb al-Ḥurrīyah wa-al-ʻAdālah (Egypt) fast (OCoLC)fst01918524 |
|
Ḥizb Jabhat al-ʻAmal al-Islāmī (Jordan) fast (OCoLC)fst00753366 |
| Subject |
Economic policy.
|
| SUBJECT |
Islamic countries -- Economic policy -- 21st century
|
|
Arab countries -- Economic policy
|
| Subject |
Arab countries.
|
|
Islamic countries.
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Abū Rummān, Muḥammad Sulaymān.
|
|
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
|
|
