Banfield's doctoral research integrated geographical understandings of experimentation in fieldwork with analytical methods more familiar to psychology. This case study outlines the practice-based element of the research design and discusses its implications for the analytical methods, which needed to remain consistent with the philosophical background to the research, while also reflecting the ways in which this philosophical footing is evolving within contemporary geography. The analytical methods needed to adhere to established procedures sufficiently closely for the research to be evaluated as robust, but the research demanded some modification of those procedures. This case study details the attempt to balance those two requirements
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references
Notes
Online resource; title from home page (viewed on December 3, 2015)
