| Description |
1 online resource (xviii, 341 pages) |
| Series |
Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 0720-1141 ; 273 |
|
Studien zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht ; 273. 0720-1141
|
| Contents |
Cover; Acknowledgements; Table of Contents; Table of Abbreviations; Chapter I: Introduction; I. Premise; 1. Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property Rights Cases between Public and Private International Law; 2. What is Included in Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules and what is not. Exclusive Jurisdiction and Subject Matter Jurisdiction; 3. Peculiarities Related to the Analysis of the Lucasfilm and Gallo Cases, and a Brief Mention of Apple's and Samsung's still Unsettled Patent War around the Globe; 4. Uniform European Union Patent and Unified Patent Litigation System: Where do we Stand? |
|
5. Terminology: Private International Law (PIL) Brussels System; Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ); Exclusive Jurisdiction; Intellectual Property; Traditional Knowledge (TK), Genetic Resources (GR) and Folklore (F); Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) ... ; 6. Internet and Geolocation Tools; II. Theses Purporting that Comity, The Act of State Doctrine and The Territoriality Principle Establish Implicit Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules; 7. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Voda Judgment and the UK Court of Appeal Lucasfilm Decision; 8. The ECJ GAT Decision |
|
10. Arguments Against the Other Rationales in Support of Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules: Foreign Immovable Property, Local Actions, the Moçambique Rule and Article 22(1) of the Brussels System Double Actionability Rule; the Sound Administration of Justice and the Judicial Economy; the Best Placed Courts; the Difficulties of Applying Foreign Laws; Non-Recognition and Non-Enforcement of Judgments on Foreign IPRs ... ; 11. Conclusions. Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules Shall be Abandoned in Benefit not only to IPRs Owners, but also to those with the Potential to Infringe IPRs: Referral |
|
12. Delimitation of this Research: Overprotection of IPRs Contracts; General Jurisdiction; Infringement Jurisdiction; Jurisdiction for Provisional Measures; Prorogation of Jurisdiction; Objective or Subjective Consolidation of Claims; Lis Pendens; Arbitrability and Judicial Settlements; Allocation of Jurisdiction in Purely Domestic Cases; Chapter II: Comparison. Exclusive Jurisdiction Rules do not Express a Customary International Law Rule. The New Trend to Abandon them; I. Aims, Delimitation and Terminology of the Comparison |
| Summary |
HauptbeschreibungBenedetta Ubertazzi argues that exclusive jurisdiction rules related to intellectual property rights cases are not only insufficiently supported by any of the arguments usually invoked in their favor, but are also in fact contrary to public international law rules concerning the avoidance of a denial of justice and the fundamental human right of access to a court. They should therefore be abandoned with respect to infringement and validity claims involving either registered or unregistered intellectual property rights. The author claims that this abandonment would b |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| SUBJECT |
Geistiges Eigentum. (DE-603)085510335 (DE-588c)4136832-0 swd |
|
Ausschließliche Zuständigkeit. (DE-603)300975317 (DE-588c)1022361708 swd |
|
Internationale Zuständigkeit. (DE-603)085069876 (DE-588c)4027387-8 swd |
| Subject |
Intellectual property.
|
|
intellectual property.
|
|
Intellectual property
|
|
Geistiges Eigentum
|
|
Internationales Zivilprozessrecht
|
|
Exklusivnorm
|
|
Internationale Zuständigkeit
|
|
Geistiges Eigentum.
|
|
Rechtsprechung.
|
|
Intellectual property.
|
|
Jurisdiction.
|
|
Territoriality.
|
|
Copyright infringement.
|
|
Infraction.
|
|
Public international law.
|
|
Private international law.
|
|
Case-law.
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| ISBN |
3161520874 |
|
9783161520877 |
|
