| Description |
1 online resource |
| Series |
Law, crime and law enforcement |
| Contents |
NATIONWIDE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING INITIATIVE; NATIONWIDE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING INITIATIVE; CONTENTS; PREFACE; Chapter 1 TERRORISM INFORMATION SHARING AND THE NATIONWIDE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORT INITIATIVE: BACKGROUND AND ISSUES FOR CONGRESS; SUMMARY; BACKGROUND; WHY INFORMATION SHARING?; Information-Sharing Systems; SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING; NATIONWIDE SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING INITIATIVE (NSI); Privacy and Civil Liberties Implications; ISE SAR Functional Standard; Community Outreach; Building Communities of Trust Initiative (BCOT) |
|
"If You See Something, Say Something™" CampaignNSI Shared Space Architecture; Training; The NSI Pilot Project; ISE-SAR EE Final Report Key Recommendations; Formation of a Program Management Offi; ISSUES FOR CONGRESS; Too Many "Dots"; Data Privacy and Access; Information Technology (IT) Infrastructure; Metrics; APPENDIX A. SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEMS; Law Enforcement Online (LEO); Regional Information Sharing Systems Program (RISS); Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN); Law Enforcement Information Sharing Program (LEISP); OneDOJ System |
|
Law Enforcement National Data Exchange (N-DEx)FBI Terrorist Threat Information Tracking Systems; Guardian; eGuardian; APPENDIX B. ACRONYMS USED IN THIS REPORT; End Notes; Chapter 2 INFORMATION SHARING: ADDITIONAL ACTIONS COULD HELP ENSURE THAT EFFORTS TO SHARE TERRORISM-RELATED SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTS ARE EFFECTIVE; WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY; WHAT GAO RECOMMENDS; WHAT GAO FOUND; ABBREVIATIONS; BACKGROUND; NSI Partners; Nationwide SAR Process; Systems Used to Share ISE-SARs; Privacy and Civil Liberties |
|
ALMOST ALL FUSION CENTERS AND 53 FEDERAL AGENCIES ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE NSI, BUT FEEDBACK ON THE USE OF SARS COULD BE ENHANCEDNSI Stakeholders Have Established the Capability to Share ISE-SARsat 74 of 78 Fusion Centers and 53 Federal Agencies; Selected State and Local Participants Reported the SAR Process Generally Worked Well, but More Feedback on the Use of SARs Could Help them Improve Reporting; Selected Federal Participants Reported the NSI Process Generally Worked Well; Agencies Are Addressing FBI Concerns about Potentially Not Receiving Some Information |
|
MAINTAINING TWO SYSTEMS THAT DUPLICATE THE FUNCTION OF SHARING ISE-SARS INTRODUCES RISKS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN FULLY ADDRESSEDShared Spaces and eGuardian Both Serve Fusion Centers and Provide Many Duplicative Services; Maintaining Both Shared Spaces and eGuardian Introduces Risks, Which Have Not Been Fully Addressed; Twenty-six Fusion Centers Were Not Always Simultaneously Submitting ISE- SARs to Shared Spaces and eGuardian; Automated Exchanges of ISE- SARs between Systems Have Not Been Fully Tested |
| Subject |
Criminal behavior, Prediction of -- United States
|
|
Terrorism -- United States -- Prevention
|
|
BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Infrastructure
|
|
SOCIAL SCIENCE / General
|
|
Criminal behavior, Prediction of
|
|
Terrorism -- Prevention
|
|
United States
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Hartmann, Laurits
|
| ISBN |
9781626187672 |
|
1626187673 |
|
