Comparative Federalism and Ethnic Conflict: A Theoretical Examination -- Federal Plans in Pre-independence India -- The Federal "Problem" in South Asia: Institutional Design before Partition -- Partition: Differences in Federal Design -- Federal Segregation or Multiculturalism? -- Federal (in)Stability in India -- Federal (in)Stability in Pakistan -- Future Prospects for India and Pakistan and Lessons for Ethnically Divided Societies
Summary
Katharine Adeney demonstrates that institutional design, rather than the role of religion, is the most important explanatory variable in understanding the different types and intensities of conflict in India and Pakistan. Deploying an innovative methodological approach, Adeney focuses on the rationale behind the creation and different designs of federal and consociational structures in the two countries. Deftly interweaving historical narrative with an analysis of the salient cleavages in both countries, Adeney examines the politics of institutional design and ethnic conflict regulation, as well as the extent to which previous constitutional choices explain current conflicts
