Introduction : sharing interpretive power -- Judicial supremacy, dialogue theory, and coordinate interpretation -- Explaining the hostility to coordinate interpretation -- The separation of powers in Canada : "partial agency" or "watertight compartments"? -- The separation of powers in Canada : "fusion" or "ambivalence"? -- The ambivalent judicial role in the separation of powers -- Legal pluralism after the Supreme Court decides -- Judicial remedies and the separation of power -- Conclusion : some final words about the "final say."
Summary
A critique of the Supreme Court of Canada's power and a defence of Parliament's role in constitutional interpretation
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 197-212) and index
