Limit search to available items
Record 28 of 1198
Previous Record Next Record
Book Cover
E-book
Author Araiza, William D., author.

Title Animus : a short introduction to bias in the law / William D. Araiza
Published New York : New York University Press, [2017]

Copies

Description 1 online resource
Series Legal Latin in practice
Legal Latin in practice.
Contents Class legislation and the prehistory of animus -- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno -- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center -- Romer v. Evans and beyond -- United States v. Windsor -- What's wrong with subjective dislike? -- Objectively objectionable -- The doctrinal uniqueness of animus -- The elusive search for animus -- How much animus is enough? and what should we do about it? -- Applying what we've learned -- Obergefell and animus -- Animus doctrine today and tomorrow
Summary An introduction to the legal concept of unconstitutional bias.If a town council denies a zoning permit for a group home for intellectually disabled persons because residents don't want "those kinds of people" in the neighborhood, the town's decision is motivated by the public's dislike of a particular group. Constitutional law calls this rationale "animus."Over the last two decades, the Supreme Court has increasingly turned to the concept of animus to explain why some instances of discrimination are unconstitutional. However, the Court's condemnation of animus fails to address some serious questions. How can animus on the part of people and institutions be uncovered? Does mere opposition to a particular group's equality claims constitute animus? Does the concept of animus have roots in the Constitution?Animus engages these important questions, offering an original and provocative introduction to this type of unconstitutional bias. William Araiza analyzes some of the modern Supreme Court's most important discrimination cases through the lens of animus, tracing the concept from nineteenth century legal doctrine to today's landmark cases, including Obergefell vs. Hodges and United States v. Windsor, both related to the legal rights of same-sex couples. Animus humanizes what might otherwise be an abstract legal question, illustrating what constitutes animus, and why the prohibition against it matters more today than ever in our pluralistic society
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references and index
Notes Online resource; title from PDF title page (EBSCO, viewed February 16, 2017)
Subject Equality before the law -- United States.
Discrimination -- Law and legislation -- United States
Sociological jurisprudence -- United States
Constitutional law -- United States.
LAW -- Essays.
LAW -- General Practice.
LAW -- Jurisprudence.
LAW -- Paralegals & Paralegalism.
LAW -- Practical Guides.
LAW -- Reference.
Constitutional law
Discrimination -- Law and legislation
Equality before the law
Sociological jurisprudence
United States
Form Electronic book
LC no. 2016045479
ISBN 9781479840939
1479840939