| Description |
1 online resource |
| Contents |
Cover -- Half-title page -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Acknowledgments -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Legal Foundation of the Corpus: The Federal Court System and Miranda Case Law -- 1.1.1 The Federal Courts -- 1.1.2 Grounds for Criminal Appeals in Federal Courts -- 1.2 The Law and Police Interrogation in the United States -- 1.3 The Strategic Linguistic Game of Police Interrogation: Invoking Counsel in Custodial Settings -- 1.4 Moving Forward: Tackling Police Interrogation and Legal Reforms in the United States |
|
2 In the Judges' Own Words: The Law and Custodial Interrogation in the United States -- 2.1 Pre-Miranda: The Fifth and Sixth Amendments and Police Interrogation -- 2.2 Miranda v. Arizona (1966): A Prophylactic Rule Riddled with Dissent -- 2.3 1966-1981: Post-Miranda and Edwards -- 2.4 Post-Edwards to Davis: 1981-1994 -- 2.5 Post-Davis to Present: 1994-2021 -- 2.5.1 Invoking Counsel: Where Do Judges "Draw the Line"? -- 2.5.2 A Closer Look at Post-Davis Rulings: Invocations for Counsel, Police "Clarifications," and Voluntariness of Waiver |
|
2.5.3 Invocations for Counsel with Added "Layers": Written versus Oral Waivers -- 2.5.4 Invocations for Counsel and L2 Speakers of English -- 3 Police Interrogation in the United States: From the Reid Technique to the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group Report -- 3.1 The Reid Technique of Interrogation: A Look at the "Manuals" -- 3.1.1 Setting the Tone of the Interrogation: Reading of Rights and Invocation of Counsel -- 3.1.2 Confronting the Suspect -- 3.1.3 Time-Limited Offers -- 3.1.4 Empathy -- 3.2 Core Principles of the Reid Technique |
|
3.2.1 The Matter of False Confessions and the Reid Technique -- 3.3 Information-Gathering Interview Approach -- 3.4 The High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group Report -- 3.4.1 What Is in the HIG Report? -- 3.5 Reid, PEACE, and the HIG Report: Additional Considerations in Light of United States Law -- 4 The Invocation Game: The Prelude to Custodial Interrogation -- 4.1 Invoking Counsel: A Constitutional Right Handicapped by the Law -- 4.1.1 Invocations As a Type of Speech Act -- 4.1.2 Maintaining Asymmetry in Police Interrogations -- 4.1.3 Mutuality of Understanding in Police Interrogation |
|
4.2 Communication As a Type of Game -- 4.3 Hypergame Dynamics -- 4.3.1 Hypergame Notation of the Invocation Game -- 4.4 Two Hypergames -- 4.4.1 Type 1 Hypergame: CS Initiates x[sub(3)]′ -- 4.4.2 Type 2 Hypergame: I Initiates x[sub(3)]′ -- 4.5 Analyzing the Invocation Game and Its Hypergames -- 4.6 Implications of the Invocation Game: Identifying Manipulation of Preferences in Police Interrogation -- 5 Invocations for Counsel, the Rulings, and the Courts: A Statistical Analysis of the Corpus -- 5.1 The Corpus -- 5.2 The Variables Tested -- 5.3 Method and Research Questions -- 5.4 Results |
| Summary |
An examination of the role of United States federal law in shaping the invocation game of police interrogation |
| Notes |
Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on January 03, 2024) |
| Subject |
Police -- United States.
|
|
Police questioning -- United States
|
|
Interviewing in law enforcement -- United States
|
|
Communication in law enforcement -- United States
|
|
Forensic linguistics -- United States
|
|
Sociolinguistics -- United States
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| ISBN |
9781009052047 |
|
1009052047 |
|
9781009062190 |
|
1009062190 |
|
