| Description |
1 online resource (308 p.) |
| Series |
Studies in Slavic Literature and Poetics Ser |
|
Studies in Slavic Literature and Poetics Ser
|
| Contents |
Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction -- Part 1: Literary Origins -- Chapter 1. Discontinuities in the Evolution of Kolyma Stories and ̀̀One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich'' -- Chapter 2. Poetry after the Gulag: Do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov Have a Lyric Mindset? -- Chapter 3. More than a Cat: Reflections on Shalamov's and Solzhenitsyn's Writings through the Perspective of Trauma Studies -- Part 2: Memory and Body -- Chapter 4. Why Did Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov Not Write The Gulag Archipelago Together? -- Chapter 5. Tactility and Memory in Shalamov |
|
Chapter 6. ̀̀A Grudge-holding Body'': Body and Memory in the Works of Varlam Shalamov -- Chapter 7. Certain Properties of Rhyme: Poetic Language Touching Abomination -- Part 3: History and Narrative -- Chapter 8. Counterfactuals and History in The Gulag Archipelago -- Chapter 9. The Gulag Archipelago: Rhetoric of History -- Chapter 10. Telling the Stories of Others and Writing the Bodies of Others: The Representation of Women in Shalamov's Kolyma Stories and Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago -- Chapter 11. The Issue of "Softening" and the Problem of Addressivity in Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov |
| Summary |
"Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hardship and hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth"-- Provided by publisher |
| Notes |
Description based upon print version of record |
|
Index |
| Subject |
Solzhenit︠s︡yn, Aleksandr Isaevich, 1918-2008 -- Criticism and interpretation
|
|
Shalamov, Varlam -- Criticism and interpretation
|
| SUBJECT |
Shalamov, Varlam fast |
|
Solzhenit︠s︡yn, Aleksandr Isaevich, 1918-2008 fast |
| Subject |
Russian prose literature -- 20th century -- History and criticism
|
|
Penal colonies in literature.
|
|
Memory in literature.
|
|
Memory in literature
|
|
Penal colonies in literature
|
|
Russian prose literature
|
| Genre/Form |
Criticism, interpretation, etc.
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| Author |
Heffermehl, Fabian
|
|
Karlsohn, Irina
|
| ISBN |
900446848X |
|
9789004468481 |
|
