| Description |
1 online resource (255 p.) |
| Series |
Routledge Studies in Intervention and Statebuilding Ser |
|
Routledge Studies in Intervention and Statebuilding Ser
|
| Contents |
Intro -- Half Title -- Series Page -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Abbreviations -- Introduction -- 0.1 Just war theory and the new interventionism -- 0.2 Jus ad bellum and the scope of this work -- 0.3 Jus ad bellum: initial principles -- 0.4 Consequences, rules, and the morality of war -- 0.5 Ethical pluralism and a reasonable just war theory -- 0.6 Plan for the book -- Notes -- References -- Part I: Ethical constraints on recourse to war: jus ad bellum vs realism and neo-traditionalism -- 1. Just war theory and the ethical restraint of war |
|
1.1 The triumph and limits of just war theory -- 1.2 Realism and the justification of war -- 1.3 Just war theory and the jus ad bellum principles -- 1.4 Last resort, proportionality, and likely success -- 1.5 Right intention, or subjective just cause -- 1.6 Just cause and the crisis of the legalist paradigm -- 1.7 Legitimate authorization: necessary and by whom? -- 1.8 Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- 2. Presumptions, principles, and prerogatives in war: against hawkish neo-traditionalism -- 2.1 Introduction: the presumption against war and the necessity of ad bellum Principles |
|
2.2 The presumption against war -- 2.3 The hawks' case against the presumption against war -- 2.4 Reply to the traditional argument regarding the presumption against war -- 2.5 Government authority and the presumption against war -- 2.6 Necessary principles or wise (unprincipled) judgment? -- 2.7 Ethics, values, and the presumption against war -- 2.8 Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- 3. Why punishment is not a just cause for war -- 3.1 Punitive war: introduction -- 3.2 Working definitions of war, just cause, and punitive war -- 3.3 Retribution and war |
|
3.4 Deterrence and other benefits as causes -- 3.5 Justifying punitive war with a combination of retribution and benefits -- 3.6 Response to punitive war on mixed grounds: the authority problem -- 3.7 Questions about liability to punitive war -- 3.8 The limited utility of punitive war -- 3.9 Examples of justified punitive wars? -- 3.10 Objection and reply -- 3.11 Ethics in measures short of war -- 3.12 Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Part II: Defense of a legalist just cause threshold |
|
4. Against the new cosmopolitan interventionism: why human rights protection is not sufficient cause for war -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.2 The cosmopolitan critique of the non-intervention norm -- 4.3 The case for the human rights paradigm -- 4.4 Against the human rights paradigm for state legitimacy -- 4.5 The presumption of state sovereignty and non-intervention -- 4.6 The role of magnitude and proportionality in the just cause threshold -- 4.7 Intervention versus revolution: the case for asymmetric standards -- 4.8 Defending the defense paradigm -- 4.9 Conclusion -- Notes -- References |
| Notes |
Description based upon print version of record |
|
5. What is it good for? Consequences and the limits of war |
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| ISBN |
9781000482669 |
|
1000482669 |
|
