| Description |
1 online resource (viii, 230 pages) |
| Contents |
Introduction -- The third degree -- The evolution of modern police interrogation practices -- The due process voluntariness test -- Miranda and its immediate aftermath -- Miranda's subsequent history -- How modern interrogators have adapted to Miranda -- Dickerson -- Miranda's limitations -- The third degree redux -- Police-induced false confessions: the scope of the problem -- Examples of police-induced false confessions -- Providing adequate fact-finding in interrogation cases -- Regulating interrogation practices in the twenty-first century -- Conclusion |
| Summary |
Did the Supreme Court's upholding of Miranda in 2000 adversely impact law enforcement, as conservatives have complained, or was it a reaffirmation of individual rights? Welsh S. White looks at both sides of the issue, emphasizing that Miranda represents just one stage in the Court's ongoing struggle to accommodate a fundamental conflict between law enforcement and civil liberties, and assessing whether the Court's present decisions (including Miranda) strike an appropriate balance between promoting law enforcement's interest in obtaining reliable evidence and the individual's interest in being protected from overreaching police practices. Welsh S. White is Professor of Law, University of Pittsburgh School of Law. He is best known for his work on capital punishment and has published and lectured on the death penalty for the past twenty years |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references and index |
| Notes |
English |
|
Print version record |
| Subject |
Right to counsel -- United States
|
|
Criminal investigation -- United States
|
|
Police questioning -- United States
|
|
LAW -- Criminal Procedure.
|
|
LAW -- General.
|
|
Criminal investigation
|
|
Police questioning
|
|
Right to counsel
|
|
United States
|
| Form |
Electronic book
|
| LC no. |
2001002078 |
| ISBN |
9780472026067 |
|
0472026062 |
|
1282944746 |
|
9781282944749 |
|
9786612944741 |
|
6612944749 |
|
